Chapter 29.
“If a better world is possible, it is possible now.”
— George Monbiot
The Limits of Fighting the Old
Having explored the Web of Power and cultivated Human Agency, the next step is to understand what works to transform societies and galvanise collective action. The frustration of unheard voices or challenges that seem insurmountable can be overcome not by endlessly fighting the old, but by strategically building the new.
The pursuit of a better world is a timeless human endeavour, yet the path to social change often feels fraught with frustration and division. We frequently witness efforts consumed by the uphill battle of fighting the old: battling entrenched systems, challenging prevailing norms, and opposing powerful interests. While resistance is a vital component of any transformative process, focusing solely on what needs to be dismantled can lead to exhaustion, fragmentation, and a narrow vision of what is possible.
Three Principles for Effective Change
Effective and sustainable social change, however, hinges on three interconnected principles that transcend conventional political divides: Don’t Fight the Old, Build the New, the truth that Political Will Follows Social Will, and the concept that Action Precedes Value Shift. These principles are amplified by the They Did It, We Can Do It paradigm, which highlights the contagious nature of successful innovation.
A wealth of behavioural research supports the idea that action precedes values. When individuals engage in initiatives with a collective dimension, such as joining a community energy cooperative or organising a local repair café, they often report stronger environmental and civic values after the fact. This is rooted in cognitive dissonance: to maintain a coherent self-image, we align beliefs with our behaviours. Neurobehavioural studies show that repeated action creates feedback loops that rewire not just habits but identities.
For example, someone advocating for public transportation improvements may soon identify as a person committed to social and climate justice, leading them to engage further. In short, personal behaviour is not just symbolic; it becomes generative when our actions are rooted in supporting collective change. Actions create identity, identity reinforces values, and values fuel broader engagement.
Build the New
The principle of Dont Fight the Old, Build the New shifts our focus from reactive opposition to proactive creation. Instead of expending energy battling existing structures, movements can strategically invest in developing viable alternatives. This is not about ignoring injustice, but about rendering it obsolete by showcasing superior ways of organising and living.
This constructive approach finds its theoretical grounding in the idea that social movements should embody the desired future society in their present practices. A related concept highlights non-hierarchical, decentralised forms of organisation, building power from below by creating spaces where new social relations can flourish.
Across the UK, community energy projects exemplify this principle. Groups have built community owned renewable energy installations, generating clean power and local benefits. These initiatives demonstrate practical alternatives to centralised energy systems, and the act of collective investment and management shifts participants’ values towards sustainability and shared responsibility.
Another area where the new is being built is through circular economy initiatives. A prominent UK retailer has implemented circular models, removing best before dates to reduce food waste and offering clothing repair services. These actions by businesses normalise new behaviours, gradually shifting consumer values towards circularity.
A Case Study in Collective Agency
We can learn much from a community group in Aberdeen, Scotland, engaged in a campaign to protect a local park, the last accessible green space in a deprived area. This is not merely a fight for a park; its a part of a broader movement pushing back against what local activists see as a corporate driven land grab.
The group argues that this development is anything but a just transition for their community, and that the park is a cost effective health investment for residents. The group has won in building a unified community and secured funding for an outdoor classroom, demonstrating how action precedes value shift. Originated from a grassroots social media page, it remains a community led effort. They have mobilised residents through protests and meetings. Beyond opposition, the group cultivates a new vision for the park. They exemplify the strength of collective agency, collaborating widely with other organisations and using art and media to tell their story. This provides a real world case study for a UK audience, highlighting how working class communities can stand against powerful interests to protect their environment.
Social Will Drives Political Will
The principle that Political Will Follows Social Will explains how the energy generated by building the new eventually compels political institutions to act. A sustained and widespread shift in public opinion creates an environment where political action becomes necessary. This dynamic is central to social movement theory.
Compelling global case studies illustrate this principle. A civil rights movement in the USA, through decades of grassroots organising, built social will against racial segregation, ultimately compelling landmark legislation.
A rights movement’s push for equality worked for decades to change hearts and minds, sharing personal stories and challenging discrimination in courts. This societal shift ultimately compelled political leaders to recognise new rights, demonstrating how legal change followed a cultural transformation. A public health movement provides a similar example where public concern led to bans, taxes, and advertising restrictions policies once politically unimaginable. Within the UK, a charge on a common item is a more recent example where growing public concern and campaigning led to a policy that reduced waste.
The Power of Example
The effectiveness of both building the new and influencing political will is amplified by the They Did It, We Can Do It paradigm. This describes how the visible success of a social change effort in one context inspires others to adapt similar strategies elsewhere, reducing perceived risk and providing concrete blueprints for action.
This paradigm is rooted in the idea that individuals learn by observing others, boosting their collective efficacy. A theory further explains how successful social innovations spread through a social system, with observability and trialability being key factors.
This paradigm is illustrated by the journey of Nonviolent Resistance. A successful application of nonviolent civil disobedience in one country provided a ‘they did it’ moment. A civil rights movement in another country explicitly studied and adapted these principles, thereby embodying the ‘we can do it’ spirit that led to their own breakthroughs. A youth movement’s overthrow of a leader in the early 2000s became a global template for nonviolent action.
Closer to home, success stories of pioneering Community Land Trusts and Housing Cooperatives have led to the diffusion of these models within the UK. These initiatives demonstrate how communities can acquire land and develop affordable homes. This tangible evidence of success reduces the perceived risk and provides practical guidance for replication across the country.
Climate Action as a Model
Applying these principles to the issue of climate change reveals a clear path for effective action. The new we are looking to build in climate action extends beyond simply reducing emissions; it encompasses the creation of entire sustainable systems. This involves the development of renewable energy infrastructure, smart grids, and the transition towards a circular economy. Each step in building this new infrastructure from community solar projects to urban greening initiatives serves as an action that can precede and cement value shifts towards sustainability.
Crafting a narrative that galvanises social will for climate action requires a focus on actual progress and the co benefits of a sustainable future, such as job creation and healthier communities. A major economies phase out of a fossil fuel serves as a powerful they did it, we can do it example, demonstrating how a transition away from a historically dominant energy source is possible.
The Paradox of Scale
The tension arises not because either side is wrong, but because they operate from different leverage points. Behavioural scientists study the individual level, where small actions can lead to internal shifts. Policy experts and system theorists, by contrast, work at the structural level. The paradox deepens when we confuse these two scales.
To break out of this contradiction, we need to reconnect individual behaviour with collective goals not just personal virtue, but public power. The way out of this trap is to reorient small acts so they contribute to large scale transformation. We need to make individual action political again not in the partisan sense, but in the collective sense. This means starting with collective action to reshape personal behaviour.
From Individual to Collective Action
Join a movement to ban cars from city centres, and youll find yourself biking more. Campaign for a four day workweek and a green job guarantee, and you may naturally reduce your working hours. These are collective actions that lay the foundation for a new economy. When people come together to drive systemic change, their personal behaviours follow. They move from guilt to agency, from isolation to belonging, from consumer to citizen.
There is a distinction between individual action and incremental policy. The former, when directed toward collective outcomes, can change the world. The latter, when captured by corporate interests, can solidify the status quo. The mistake is not in acting small. The mistake is in thinking that small acts within broken systems amount to change.
A Theory of Catalytic Action
We need a new theory of catalytic action one that recognises the power of individual behaviour, but refuses to let it be co-opted. Such a theory would start with personal behaviour changes aimed at collective actions for systemic change, use individual behaviour to build shared values, and mobilise people not just to consume better, but to confront power.
Want to change the world? Start a food co-op. This is not just a personal choice; its building a new economic system that redefines food production. Organise a repair café. You’re not just fixing items. You’re demonstrating a circular economy in action and inspiring a community to value repair over disposal. Launch a community housing initiative. Turn your private concern into a public good.
These acts may seem small, but they create the scaffolding for something bigger: a society where the default behaviour is regenerative, the systems support human and planetary flourishing, and the gap between values and structures finally begins to close.
The Both/And of Change
In the end, it’s not a question of either/or, either small action or systemic transformation, but both/and. The key is alignment. When individual action serve systemic change, and systemic change enables individual action, the feedback loop becomes not only positive, but revolutionary.
Next Chapter: New Economies: Models & Governance
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, 1962.
Bandura, Albert. Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall, 1977.
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Benford, Robert D. and Snow, David A. Social Movements: The Key Concepts. Routledge, 2010.
Boggs, Carl. Gramsci’s Marxism. Pluto Press, 1976.
Goldwert, D. et al. “Climate action literacy interventions increase commitments to more effective mitigation behaviors.” PNAS Nexus, 2025.
McAdam, Doug; Tarrow, Sidney; and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, 1962.
Rowbotham, Sheila. Women, Resistance and Revolution: A History of Women and Revolution in the Modern World. Pantheon Books Inc, 1972.
Sitrin, Marina. Horizontalism: Voices of Popular Power in Argentina. AK Press, 2006.