Chapter 11.
With the growth of the ‘rule of law’ has come the growth of ‘rights,’ and pre-eminent among these is the freedom of speech. This has grown to include the freedom of information. From street corners to pamphlets and the internet, the medium has also been the message. Information has taken its place alongside physical, political, and legal power. The term “Fourth Estate,” coined by Thomas Carlyle in his work On Heroes, Hero Worship, and the Heroic in History (1841), places the press alongside the clergy, nobility, and commoners, highlighting the media’s significant influence in shaping public discourse. The media acts as a watchdog, scrutinising the actions of governments and bringing matters of public interest to light. This role is fundamental to a democratic society.
Throughout history, the methods of disseminating information have evolved dramatically. The invention of the printing press in the 15th century revolutionised communication, enabling the mass production of written materials and the wider dissemination of knowledge. Early forms of journalism, like pamphlets and newspapers, played a crucial role in shaping public opinion during pivotal moments such as the American and French Revolutions. The 19th and 20th centuries saw the rise of mass media, with the development of radio, television, and film. These new technologies further amplified the reach and influence of information, creating a more interconnected global society. However, the concentration of media ownership in a few powerful corporations has raised concerns about potential biases and the suppression of dissenting voices. The pursuit of profit can sometimes overshadow journalistic integrity, leading to sensationalism, superficial reporting, and the prioritisation of entertainment over substantive analysis. This trend has been exacerbated by the rise of the internet and social media, which, while democratising access to information, have also created new challenges related to misinformation, disinformation, and the erosion of traditional journalistic standards.
The internet has ushered in a new era of information dissemination, characterised by unprecedented speed, reach, and interactivity. Social media platforms have become powerful tools for citizen journalism, activism, and social movements, enabling individuals to bypass traditional gatekeepers and share their perspectives with a global audience. The Arab Spring uprisings, for example, demonstrated the transformative potential of social media in mobilising protests and challenging authoritarian regimes. While these technologies empower individuals, they can also be used to spread propaganda, manipulate public opinion, and incite violence. A significant factor shaping the modern media landscape is the pervasive influence of algorithms. Social media platforms rely heavily on complex algorithms to curate and deliver content to users, often with unintended consequences. As Johann Hari argues in Stolen Focus, our ability to pay attention is being eroded by a combination of factors, deeply intertwined with the modern media environment. The design of social media platforms, driven by the need to maximise engagement for advertising revenue, is often engineered to exploit psychological vulnerabilities. Features like infinite scrolling, variable reward schedules (such as likes and notifications), and personalised content feeds all contribute to a state of constant distraction and fragmented attention. This, Hari contends, has profound implications for how we consume and process media.
One of the primary concerns highlighted by Hari is the tendency of algorithms to prioritise engagement over accuracy. Content that elicits strong emotional responses, such as anger, outrage, or excitement, is often given greater prominence in social media feeds, regardless of its veracity. This can lead to the amplification of misinformation and disinformation, as false or misleading stories that are highly sensationalised are more likely to be shared and spread rapidly. This algorithmic amplification of sensationalism directly impacts the quality of information that reaches the public, potentially distorting their understanding of events and issues.
The rise of social media has further complicated the dynamics of public opinion. In the past, the media held a virtual monopoly on the dissemination of information. Today, individuals can bypass traditional media outlets and share their thoughts and experiences directly with a global audience. This has led to a proliferation of voices and a more fragmented information landscape. The Court of Public Opinion is no longer solely shaped by a few powerful institutions, but by a multitude of individual actors and online communities. Hari’s work helps explain that while this democratisation of information is seemingly positive, it is also fraught with challenges, including the ease with which misinformation can spread online, posing a significant threat to the integrity of public discourse. The tendency for individuals to be primarily exposed to information that confirms their existing beliefs—a phenomenon often called the echo chamber effect or filter bubble—has become a growing concern. Social media algorithms frequently reinforce these self-confirming information environments, which can limit exposure to diverse perspectives and foster polarisation. This is not simply a matter of individual preference; it is a consequence of how these platforms are designed. This can lead to a breakdown in civil discourse and make it more difficult to find common ground on important issues.
The power of the media extends beyond simply reporting the news. Media organisations also play a crucial role in shaping cultural narratives and influencing social trends. Television shows, movies, music, and advertising all contribute to our understanding of the world. These cultural products can reinforce or challenge existing power structures. The Fourth Estate, encompassing traditional media and the evolving digital landscape, wields immense power. This power carries with it a profound responsibility to uphold journalistic integrity, promote informed discourse, and hold those in power accountable. In an increasingly interconnected and complex world, the media’s role in fostering a well-informed citizenry is more critical than ever. The future of society depends, in no small measure, on the responsible exercise of this power. As Johann Hari’s Stolen Focus makes clear, this responsibility is made even more challenging by the ways in which our attention is being eroded by the very technologies that define the modern media landscape.
Next Chapter: Wealth: A Matter of Money
Bibliography:
Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Carlyle, Thomas. On Heroes, Hero Worship, and the Heroic in History. 1841.
Fiske, John. Television Culture. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2011.
Hall, Stuart, editor. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. 2nd ed., Sage Publications, 2013.
Hari, Johann. Stolen Focus: Why You Can’t Pay Attention—and How to Think Deeply Again. Crown, 2022.
Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011.
Schudson, Michael. The Sociology of News. 2nd ed., W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.
Stephens, Mitchell. A History of News. 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2014.
Sunstein, Cass R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press, 2007.
Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, 2011.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, 2019.